Timeline for What are some recent developments in density functional theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2021 at 13:39 | history | edited | Jack | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
support more details
|
| Jan 2, 2021 at 13:25 | history | edited | Jack | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor editting
|
| Dec 3, 2020 at 19:29 | history | edited | Nike Dattani - No Free Time | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Sep 19, 2020 at 0:26 | comment | added | Jack | @NikeDattani Thanks for your suggestions. I will try my best to follow the rules of your community. I agree that you delete my OFDFT answer. But I will edit my other answer related to the band-gap problem, it is one of the most recent improvements in the DFT field. | |
| Sep 19, 2020 at 0:10 | comment | added | Nike Dattani - No Free Time | I gave you +1 on this answer now, but I see that other people gave you -1 on all three, and a moderator deleted your other two answers. I did not tell anyone to do either of those things (I was not even at my computer for the last 7 hours), it was just that others did not like what you did. Also the mod that deleted your answers didn't downvote you (Tyberius has 1 total downvote). In general if you're just going to be copying and pasting an abstract, it's probably better to just write a link to the paper in a comment. You can't earn rep for posting an abstract of someone else's paper :) | |
| Sep 19, 2020 at 0:06 | comment | added | Nike Dattani - No Free Time | @Jack You say that you doubt that it's reasonable for us to have each answer addressing just one topic: You are free to express that opinion here: mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/a/126/5 (there have been some arguments for following the one-topic-per-answer format (for example if 3 topics were in one answer, are we upvoting because we like OFDFT, or because we like DFT+NEGF or because we like the answer about band-gaps? What if someone likes OFDFT but does NOT like the other two, how do they split the vote)? We also don't 3 different comment chains on one answer. | |
| Sep 18, 2020 at 22:16 | comment | added | Jack | @NikeDattani [What are some recent developments in density functional theory?]. This is the question. I agree OFTDFT can't be thought of as the recent development. But my other two answers [citations > 500] are no problem. I just cut the abstract to explain what they have done and cited the paper. PS: Is the style of [each answer to address one topic] reasonable? I doubt it. | |
| Sep 18, 2020 at 17:25 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Sep 18, 2020 at 17:43 | |||||
| Sep 18, 2020 at 15:35 | comment | added | Nike Dattani - No Free Time | I would recommend keeping this answer and removing the other two. We highly prefer that a user doesn't answer several times on the same question, and instead of spending time on 3 topics, spends 3x the amount of time on 1 topic. Since the other two answers are just copying and pasting abstracts from other people's papers, I would recommend to keep this one :) | |
| Sep 18, 2020 at 15:07 | comment | added | Jack | @NikeDattani I have updated my answers. That is the correct format? If the answer is no, please help me to edit the answer to the correct format. | |
| Sep 18, 2020 at 14:59 | history | edited | Jack | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor editting
|
| Sep 18, 2020 at 14:49 | comment | added | Tyberius♦ | This a good start to a couple different answers, but ideally we would prefer each answer to address one topic. | |
| Sep 18, 2020 at 14:48 | comment | added | Nike Dattani - No Free Time | Can you please follow the format of the other answers? | |
| Sep 18, 2020 at 14:07 | history | answered | Jack | CC BY-SA 4.0 |