The low-energy effective model for Weyl semimetals (WSM) at a single Weyl point can be written as:
$$H_{w}=\chi \vec{k} \cdot \vec{\sigma}, \tag{1} $$
where $\chi$ is the chirality index, $\vec{k}$ is the crystal momentum, and $\vec{\sigma}$ is the vector of Pauli matrices. The symmetry behavior for $\vec{k}$ and $\vec{\sigma}$ under time-reversal ($\mathcal{T}$) and inversion ($\mathcal{P}$) operations is well-known:
- $\mathcal{T}\vec{\sigma}=-\vec{\sigma}; \mathcal{T}\vec{k}=-\vec{k}$;
- $\mathcal{P}\vec{\sigma}=+\vec{\sigma}; \mathcal{P}\vec{k}=-\vec{k}$;
On the other hand, the Weyl semimetal can be classified as nonmagnetic and magnetic ones. Consider the first one, the system respects $\mathcal{T}$ but breaks $\mathcal{P}$ (we assume there is a total of four Weyl points), we can conclude that: $$\mathcal{T}\chi=\chi \tag{2}$$ For the second case, the system respects $\mathcal{P}$ but breaks $\mathcal{T}$ (we assume there is a total of two Weyl points), we can conclude that: $$\mathcal{P}\chi=-\chi \tag{3}$$
Eq.(2) and Eq.(3) are correct? If not, how Eq.(1) can be used to describe the magnetic and nonmagnetic WSMs simultaneously? Or how does the low-energy model by considering all possible Weyl points respect the original symmetry that the system holds?