When we think about computers and computing today, almost invariably we think about digital computers, the ever-present objects today. But reading this question in the Chemistry stackexchange, How are the atomic orbitals for multi electron atoms obtained?, there's a great answer that delves a bit into the history of quantum theory and matter modeling, with this interesting picture, reminding us that it wasn't always like that:
That photo shows matter modeling pioneers, Douglas Hartree and Arthur Porter, together with a computer they built themselves to solve differential equations and study quantum-mechanical systems, in the 1930s, generating tables like these:
That was no ordinary computer, at least not in the sense we use the word today, because it predates digital machines like ENIAC and Colossus by several years. It was an analog computer, a differential analyser built from parts of a children toy invented in 1898, called Meccano, kind of a 19th century Lego. So Hartree and Porter pulled the equivalent to someone today building a working supercomputer from scratch, out of lego blocks, and using it successfully to do groundbreaking research. It was surely an impressive feat at the time. They were real-life McGyvers.
Before the digital revolution, analog computers like the one used by Hartree were used to tackle all sorts of hard problems you couldn't calculate by hand, like ammunition trajectories and even to put men in the moon and bring them back safely. But as time passed and digital programmable devices were developed, and then became small and cheaper, analog computers became a road not taken in science, mostly forgotten, a footnote in history.
Yet, I could find a paper (1) from the 70s showing how to solve the particle in a finite potential well with them. Also, once I watched a talk by late physicist Freeman Dyson where he says it was proven (2, 3) in 1981 that some numbers are analog-computable but not Turing-computable, and thus analog computers are more powerful than digital computers, at least in principle.
That makes me wonder, the use of Analog Computers really died out in Matter Modelling, or there's still people researching their use today, to tackle problems in the field?