8
$\begingroup$

Calculation of band structure and Density of States (DOS) is ubiquitous in matter modelling research publications.

What are some properties that can be deduced from a band structure plot and density of states diagram? Also if possible explain how to deduce them?

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Some of the properties we can get from the band structure are:

  • Band gap: energy between the bottom of the conduction band (CB) and the top of the valence band (VB). The gap will give you if the material is a metal (zero gap), a semiconductor (gap greater than zero and lower than $\sim 3eV$ or insulating (gap $> 3eV$). To identify the conduction/valence band, you need to identify the Fermi energy and look for the bands around it.
  • The type of gap: direct or indirect gap. If the minimum of the CB is aligned with the maximum of the VB (they have the same value of $\mathbf k$) the system has a direct gap. If the are no alignment, the gap is indirect. This has direct implication in optical transitions.
  • Electron and hole effective masses. In semiconductor physics, the effective mass is a very useful concept. Assuming that the bottom of the CB (an the top of the VB) are parabolic, the effective mass can be obtained from fitting the expression $E(\mathbf k) = E_0 + \frac{\hbar^2\mathbf k^2}{2m^*}$.
  • Spin polarization. Normally, the calculations are done considering both spins. In case the system present spin polarization, there would be split of the bands: one set for spin up and one set for spin down.
| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Very nice answer overall. However, why do you say in "band gap" that it is restricted to the energy difference between CV and VB "at the Gamma point"? The band gap can be found at any point in the Brillouin zone, not only Gamma. And indeed, as you explain in the next part, the VBM and CBM need not be at the same k-point. $\endgroup$ – ProfM Jul 30 at 6:38
  • $\begingroup$ @ProfM you are absolute right. Should I add something like "in general" before "at the Gamma point"? $\endgroup$ – Camps Jul 30 at 15:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I would simply remove "in the Gamma point" and then it would be perfect I think. $\endgroup$ – ProfM Jul 30 at 15:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.