3
$\begingroup$

Disclaimer: Assume the questioner is a novice in DFT

Is PAW an improvement over the pseudopotential method? In terms of Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) parameterization, what is the difference between PAW-PBE and GGA-PBE?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Related answer: mattermodeling.stackexchange.com/a/1986/5. Particularly the part starting with "There is no systematic manner for deciding which pseudopotential is ‘better’ as a pseudopotential..." $\endgroup$ – Nike Dattani Oct 12 at 18:15
  • $\begingroup$ That was a nicely detailed answer. That still leaves the PBE part out. Also, I've started putting these disclaimers so answers would become novice-friendly. No harm in having the same question twice on the SE; one for seasoned DFTers, another for rookies. $\endgroup$ – Hitanshu Sachania Oct 12 at 18:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This question could use more clarity. "Is PAW an improvement over the pseudopotential method" would be a good standalone question for the site (although it has a partial answer already as @NikeDattani notes). I'm not sure what the second part is asking - perhaps you could elaborate and ask it as a separate question? $\endgroup$ – wcw Oct 13 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ @wcw, your suggestion will make this a better question but will make Jack's answer seem misplaced. Should I edit his answer to include the original question? $\endgroup$ – Hitanshu Sachania Oct 14 at 11:48
  • $\begingroup$ I am not a moderator so I don't want to overstep, but here is one idea. Maybe this question could be something like "what is the relationship between PAW/pseudopotentials and XC functionals?", assuming I've understood your intent correctly. And then you could ask "Is PAW an improvement over the pseudopotential method?" as a separate question since Jack's answer doesn't really address that part anyway. $\endgroup$ – wcw Oct 14 at 20:05
2
$\begingroup$

PAW is proposed to deal with the interaction between electrons and ions. However, PBE or GGA (PBE just one kind of GGA) is just the exchange-correlation functional. You can think PAW and PBE are related to the two different terms in the Kohn-Sham equation. So your question is totally meaningless because you are comparing two completely different concepts.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Understood. I have a doubt, though. When a PP file says PAW-PBE, does it mean it uses the PAW method for the ion-electron interaction and GGA-PBE as the xc functional? $\endgroup$ – Hitanshu Sachania Oct 13 at 11:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes. For example, the POTCAR for each element in VASP contains information for pseudopotential and exchange-correlation. $\endgroup$ – Jack Oct 13 at 14:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ PAW involves more than just the electron/ion interaction. For example, it allows determination of all-electron kinetic energies. $\endgroup$ – wcw Oct 13 at 17:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @wcw What's information contained POTCAR of VASP? Except for exchange-correlation functional and pseudopotential. $\endgroup$ – Jack Oct 14 at 5:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Projectors, all-electron basis functions, pseudized basis functions, core densities, augmentation charge info, etc. And this is a little pedantic, but strictly PAW isn't a pseudopotential method - it's all-electron (usually with a frozen core). So the PAW transformation affects every term in the energy functional. $\endgroup$ – wcw Oct 14 at 10:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.