5
$\begingroup$

I just calculated the stiffness tensor for a given material (a monoclinic molecular crystal) using molecular simulation. When trying to compare my results to published experimental results I found that the crystal structure I used for simulation, though essentially the same as the one used as reference system in experiment, has different base vectors/reference frame (P21/n vs P21/a) - therefore I can compare invariants and averages but not the individual components c_ij of the stiffness (as matrix in Voigt notation).

So my question is: given the, altogether six, lattice vectors of the two crystal structures, how can I use this information to generate a rotation matrix to transform the Voigt matrix from experiment (based on a crystal in the P21/a space group) so that I can compare it to my calculated numbers from simulation (based on a crystal with P21/n symmetry)?

What comes closest to an answer I found here: http://solidmechanics.org/text/Chapter3_2/Chapter3_2.htm but I am not sure what the two bases (e and m, in section 3.2.11 Basis change formulas for anisotropic elastic constants) are - are these the normalized lattice vectors of the two structures in Cartesian coordinates? if not what else?

thanks!

michael

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

In order to define the matrix transforming the P21/n structure into P21/a it is imperative to know the unique axis of both space groups.

For example the contracted P21/n symbol can be used for the full P21/n11 symbol (unique monoclinic axis along a), for the full P121/n1 (unique axis along b) and for the full P1121/n (unique axis along c).

The same apply for P21/a (i.e. it could stand for P21/n11,...).

So you have to understand the exact settings of space groups, then you can find the transformation matrix relating them. For example, if you have the initial and final settings P121/n1 -> P121/a1 (same unique b axis in bth space groups), the corresponding transformation matrix is: [-1 0 1] [ 0 1 0] [-1 0 0] that is -a-c,b,a

If you have P121/n1 -> P1121/a, than the transformation matrix is -a-c,c,b

$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for your answer! ... I am not sure though whether it answers the question ... I am looking for a rotation matrix to convert the stiffness tensor (either the 4th rank tensor, or preferably the Voigt matrix), and not just to rotate the structure/coordinates - or are these the same? $\endgroup$ – Michael Brunsteiner Jan 6 at 15:53
  • $\begingroup$ sorry and one more follow up ... I want to convert C21/a to C21/n (and not the other direction as discussed by you) - would I just use the inverse of the matrix you provided in this case? $\endgroup$ – Michael Brunsteiner Jan 6 at 15:56
  • $\begingroup$ what do you mean with C21/a and C21/n? It seems to me that these space groups do not exist. $\endgroup$ – gryphys Jan 6 at 16:02
  • $\begingroup$ In any case to answer to your first comment, I never made a transformation with a 4th rank tensor, but it shuold be the same as for a 2nd one. $\endgroup$ – gryphys Jan 6 at 16:05
  • $\begingroup$ sorry ... i meant P21/n or a .... typo ... and I was talknig about a voigt matrix which is not a tensor at all, but it can still be transformed with a nother matrix to account for a differnt base/reference ... so what i meant can i use the rotation matrix you provided for this purpose? $\endgroup$ – Michael Brunsteiner Jan 6 at 16:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.