8
$\begingroup$

Since I have started working on monolayers I was using the ISIF=3 tag for relaxation, this was after recompiling VASP with the modified "constr_cell_relax.F" file. There was no problem in relaxing pure materials, but with the doping of 4x4x1 supercells I don't get convergence in relaxation and the calculations are taking too too much time. On the other hand my friend is using the tag ISIF=4 and he is getting always converged results.

Now I am a little bit confused with which tag should be used, since I think that because of vacuum along the c axis there should be no relaxation along it, so ISIF=4 tag shouldn't be used. I want to know your opinions, especially if you have worked on relaxing doped monolayers.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The convergence problems may be related to ALGO and IBRION, rather than ISIF. $\endgroup$
    – Jack
    Feb 17, 2021 at 4:31
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Take a look at this post: mattermodeling.stackexchange.com/questions/2022/…. By the way, the ISIF=3 tag with recompiled VASP [ modified constr_cell_relax.F] is suitable for monolayer relaxation. Also this post: mattermodeling.stackexchange.com/questions/2032/… $\endgroup$
    – Jack
    Feb 17, 2021 at 10:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @NikeDattani Thanks for your suggestions. Later I will post an answer. $\endgroup$
    – Jack
    Sep 5, 2021 at 23:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Jack any luck coming up with an answer. Also, I was able to edit your 3 comments into just 1. $\endgroup$
    – Tyberius ♦
    Nov 19, 2021 at 2:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ChiKou were you able to figure out any of this? Is there any update you can give us? $\endgroup$
    – Nike Dattani
    Jan 13, 2022 at 0:53

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
4
$\begingroup$

When dealing with monolayers, I have found that using the ISIF=4 tag is better and is less time-consuming. As mentioned in Vaspwiki, it allows the relaxation of both lattice constants and atomic coordinates with a fixed volume. However, what is important here is uncommenting the FCELL(3,3)=SAVE line in constr_cell_relax.F file and recompiling VASP. This trick prevents the relaxation along the z-direction, which is negligible in monolayers.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .