I am simulating a droplet of water with GROMACS. The droplet consists of about 200 TIP3P water molecules and is placed near the center of a large, mostly empty box (so that it behaves like a free droplet in a vacuum, in spite of periodic boundary conditions. I had to do this as GROMACS2021 does not allow a simulation without PBC).

Now, I have to calculate the radial distribution function of the oxygen atoms and hydrogen atoms from the center of mass of the whole unit cell. However, I am not sure how to do this with gmx rdf. The documentation on the RDF module is minimal, and not clear at all.

I tried to run this:

gmx rdf -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -n index.ndx -o com-O.xvg -ref "com of group 0" -sel 3

In the index.ndx file, group 0 is System, group 3 is O atoms. However, this gave a graph that looks like this:

com-O rdf

The graph is very squiggly, and I expected a smoother graph.

I have also tried to use -ref 0 -selrpos dyn_mol_com but that gives a graph even more uneven.

So my question is what commands should I use with gmx rdf to get the rdf, and whether my graph looks ok or not?

Note: I have already gone through these two pages: gmx rdf and selection syntax and usage, but I cannot understand what they mean. Please don't redirect me to those pages!

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ +1. I don't have the answer for you, but I thought I'd link some related questions here. About RDFs in GROMACS: mattermodeling.stackexchange.com/q/3976/5, and about RDFs in general: mattermodeling.stackexchange.com/q/3852/5, mattermodeling.stackexchange.com/q/3624/5, mattermodeling.stackexchange.com/q/90/5. $\endgroup$ Mar 15 '21 at 23:01
  • $\begingroup$ Are you open to using other packages, like mdtraj or mdanalysis (both python)? $\endgroup$
    – lewiso1
    Mar 21 '21 at 23:09
  • $\begingroup$ @lewiso1 Do you mean other packages just for trajectory analysis, or the simulation itself? I can use any software for trajectory analysis, but the simulation has to be ran in gromacs. $\endgroup$
    – S R Maiti
    Mar 22 '21 at 11:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I added an answer using numpy, but just realised you can probably get rid of the squiggliness by just reducing the binwidth. The droplet only has a radius of 1nm, which is quite small, so currently the RDF is way higher resolution than what you need and there's a lot of noise. Try adding -bin 0.15 to your gmx rdf $\endgroup$
    – lewiso1
    Mar 23 '21 at 0:26

Here's an approach calculating it by hand with numpy. The coordinates are loaded from the trajectory using mdtraj in python:

import mdtraj as md
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

#load trajectory:
traj = md.load('traj.dcd', top='solvated.pdb')
##You would write this:
##traj = md.load_xtc('md.xtc', top='top.gro')

#select oxygen atom indices:
oxy = traj.top.select('name O')

#calculate masses of all atoms:
masses = np.array([i.element.mass for i in traj.topology.atoms])

#iterate through all frames and save the distances of each atom to the centre of mass:
d = list()
for frame in traj.xyz:
    oxy_coords = frame[oxy]
    #COM of whole system:
    centre_of_mass = np.average(frame, axis=0, weights=masses)
    #COM of just the oxygens:
    #centre_of_mass = oxy_coords.mean(0)
    vectors = (oxy_coords - centre_of_mass)
    distances = np.linalg.norm(vectors, axis=1)
    d += list(distances)

##Take a histogram:
counts, lengths = np.histogram(d,bins=10)
#normalize 'counts' by averaging across the number of trajectory frames:
counts = counts / len(traj)
#calculate the volume of each spherical shell:
shell_volumes = 4/3*np.pi* ( lengths[1:]**3 - lengths[:-1]**3 )
#normalize 'counts' by the volume of each shell:
counts = counts / shell_volumes

plt.plot( (lengths[:-1]+lengths[1:])/2, 
           counts , '-o' )
plt.ylabel('Number density per nm^3')
plt.xlabel('r (nm)')
plt.axhline(33.6, label='Waters per cubic nm\nat room temp and pressure', c='k')

I tried this on an example trajectory and it returns the graph below, which has number density ~33, which is what you would expect at room temperature and pressure. Note that I extracted a water droplet from a simulation of a periodic liquid system with a barostat, so your result will be different if you used a water droplet as the simulation system.


  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! One thing I noticed is the line centre_of_mass = oxy_coords.mean(0). I assume this means the centre of mass is being estimated by the oxygen atoms only? How do I also consider the hydrogen atoms because I want to use the precise centre of mass of the unit cell? $\endgroup$
    – S R Maiti
    Mar 23 '21 at 9:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sure - I edited the code to do this. The difference is you take an array of masses, and then when calculating centre_of_mass use np.average on all coordinates to find the mean coordinate, weighted by masses $\endgroup$
    – lewiso1
    Mar 25 '21 at 2:17
  • $\begingroup$ Your answer here was very helpful, could you please help me with this question too, if possible?: mattermodeling.stackexchange.com/questions/6291/… $\endgroup$
    – S R Maiti
    Jul 1 '21 at 8:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.