I'm making a topological analysis of a nanotube interacting with some metals.

The steps for the calculations were:

  • Optimizing the geometry (I am using SIESTA code).
  • Obtain the electronic density for the final relaxed structure (in cube format with the help of DENCHAR utility that is part of the SIESTA distribution): density files for total electron density (RHO), spin up electron density (RHO.UP) and spin down electron density (RHO.DOWN).
  • Run topological analysis with CRITIC21,2 software.

For the three metals under study, I got a bond critical point from the RHO file.
When analyzing the RHO.UP and RHO.DOWN files, for two metals I got two critical points (one for each spin). But for one metal, I only got one bond critical point.

As the recommended way to run topological studies is using the wavefunction directly instead the electron density, I run the topological analysis from density files with different grid size.

The question: Can I have a bond formed for only one spin?

1 A.Otero-de-la-Roza, M.A.Blanco, A. Martín Pendás, Víctor Luaña. Critic: a new program for the topological analysis of solid-state electron densities, Computer Physics Communications Volume 180, Issue 1, January 2009, Pages 157-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2008.07.018

2 A.Otero-de-la-Roza, Erin R.Johnson, Víctor Luaña, Critic2: A program for real-space analysis of quantum chemical interactions in solids, Computer Physics Communications Volume 185, Issue 3, March 2014, Pages 1007-1018. DOI:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.10.026


Yes, see e.g. the hydrogen molecule cation.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Can you share any reference about? Thanks. $\endgroup$
    – Camps
    Apr 5 at 20:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Reference for what? $\endgroup$ Apr 6 at 0:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Camps en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dihydrogen_cation $\endgroup$
    – wzkchem5
    Jul 3 at 18:25
  • $\begingroup$ So yeah, this is a paper from 1927. link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01504875 $\endgroup$ Jul 5 at 6:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Camps Sorry I didn't read your question carefully. The absence of bond critical point does not mean a complete absence of bonding. Suppose you have a three-membered ring ABC, so that A-B, B-C and A-C are all bonded. Now you increase the ABC angle until it reaches 180 degrees. At ABC=180 degrees, there is certainly no bond critical point between A and C. So there must be an angle at which the bond critical point disappears abruptly. But you cannot say the A-C bonding suddenly disappears at that angle. There is no qualitative change of electronic structure at that point. $\endgroup$
    – wzkchem5
    Jul 5 at 17:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.