17
$\begingroup$

I have been looking at using Goedecker-Teter-Hutter (GTH) pseudo-potentials and I came across the abbreviation PADE.

I was wondering what this abbreviation actually stood for and how it is related to LDA?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I've advertised this question in a few places and solicited more people to chime in with different perspectives, so perhaps you might consider to unaccept the answer until they all come in! $\endgroup$ Aug 12 at 18:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Also, I can recommend Carl Benders comments on this (Time Stamp 51:55) youtube.com/watch?v=nWKYrpKn3-0&t=3115s $\endgroup$
    – Ron
    Aug 26 at 5:51
22
$\begingroup$

To complement mykd's already excellent answer, I will just add that the approximant we all learn in school (the Taylor approximant) is nice to teach and easy to help students learn the concept of approximations, but in practice it's one of the worst options in terms of it's accuracy-to-complexity ratio.

The Taylor approximant matches the $n^{\textrm{th}}$ derivative at a single point. It is extremely rare that you would actually care about the 8th derivative (for example) matching at a single point. More likely, you would want the first, second and maybe third derviatives to match at several points (i.e. you want the whole function to be well approximated). But in the example below, even the 7th order Taylor approximant is not enough for the approximant to match the original function at $x=7$:

enter image description here

That is very unfortunate since a 7th degree polynomial will shoot off to $\pm \infty$ extremely rapidly (as high-order polynomials always do), so even if such an approximant was excellent at describing the original function in some small region, it would extrapolate horrendously.

Furthermore, imagine trying to approximate a very simple function like $1/x$ with a (Taylor) polynomial near $x=0$. This would be quite impossible, but imagine if instead of trying to come up with the best polynomial approximation, we instead tried to come up with the best rational function approximation. Now we have the flexibility of adjusting the coefficients in two polynomials (the one in the numerator and the one in the denominator) instead of just one of them like in the Taylor series, and the singularities where the denominator of the original function is zero, can now be treated very naturally.

That is precisely the reason for Padé functions: Trying to give the best rational approximation to a function, rather than just the best polynomial approximation to a function.

Here are just some of the many different types of approximants which are often superior to the Taylor series, for various practical applications, but are unfortunately not given much attention, even in advanced-level calculus courses:

$\endgroup$
16
$\begingroup$

PADE refers to the mathematician Henri Padé, who developed the Padé approximation, which can approximate a function using rational polynomial functions.

For ex:

$$ \sin(x)\approx {\frac {(12671/4363920)x^{5}-(2363/18183)x^{3}+x}{1+(445/12122)x^{2}+(601/872784)x^{4}+(121/16662240)x^{6}}} $$

This feature is used to approximate the total correlational functional and Kinetic Energy functional for the Local Density Approximation (LDA) methods.

See Padé approximants in density functional theory.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.