Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with integrals
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 838
For 1- and 2-electron integrals in electronic structure calculations, before Hartree-Fock or some other type of self-consistent-field calculation, or the integral transformation which is done after HF or SCF.
6
votes
Accepted
Reintegrate calculation results from ORCA using finer grid?
The standard solution is to run a new ORCA calculation with a larger grid, and read your current wavefunction (from the GBW files that you got) as initial guess:
! (level of theory etc...)
! DefGrid3 …
- 10.2k
6
votes
Exploiting 8-fold symmetry of ERI tensor for building Coulomb and Exchange matrices
The above tricks (plus OpenMP parallelization) should already give you a code that rivals the best codes in terms of efficiency (but note that the contraction of integrals with density matrix elements … is usually not the rate-determining step; rather, the bottleneck is usually the calculation of the integrals and/or the I/O of the FCIDUMP file), at least for molecules that are small enough such that …
- 10.2k
4
votes
Simplifying double integrals of isotropic functions
The work is a single integral over $|r_1-r_2|$, not a double integral over $r_1$ and $r_2$. As you are fixing particle 1, you shouldn't integrate over particle 1. Moreover, the work is $w(r) = \int Fd …
- 10.2k